Working Paper: NBER ID: w24617
Authors: Lars Lefgren; David Sims; Olga Stoddard
Abstract: We perform an experiment to measure how changes in the effort exerted by a small fraction of a low-reward group affect the willingness of the high-reward group to vote for redistributive taxation. We find that a substantial fraction of high reward subjects vote in favor of greater redistribution when a very small fraction of high-effort individuals is added to a pool of otherwise low-effort poor. Contaminating a group of high-effort poor with a small number of low-effort individuals causes the most generous rich subjects to vote for less redistribution. These results suggest that anecdotes about the deservedness of a small group of transfer recipients may be effective in changing support for redistribution. We find large gender differences in the results. Relative to men, women respond three times more strongly to the existence of high-effort individuals among the poor. This behavior may help explain gender differences in support for redistribution more generally.
Keywords: redistribution; voting; gender differences; effort; deservingness
JEL Codes: D3; H2
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| perceived effort of individuals in the poor group (I32) | voting behavior of the rich (D72) |
| addition of high-effort individuals to low-effort group (C92) | voting for redistribution (D72) |
| contamination of high-effort individuals by low-effort individuals (D29) | voting for redistribution (D72) |
| perceived effort levels among the poor (I32) | voters' perceptions of deservingness (D72) |
| presence of high-effort individuals among the poor (I32) | responsiveness of women to redistribution (J16) |