The Effect of Infrastructure on Worker Mobility: Evidence from High-Speed Rail Expansion in Germany

Working Paper: NBER ID: w24507

Authors: Daniel F. Heuermann; Johannes F. Schmieder

Abstract: We use the expansion of the high-speed rail network in Germany as a natural experiment to examine the causal effect of reductions in commuting time between regions on the commuting decisions of workers and their choices regarding where to live and where to work. We exploit three key features in this setting: i) investment in high-speed rail has, in some cases dramatically, reduced travel times between regions, ii) several small towns were connected to the high-speed rail network only for political reasons, and iii) high-speed trains have left the transportation of goods unaffected. Combining novel information on train schedules and the opening of high-speed rail stations with panel data on all workers in Germany, we show that a reduction in travel time by one percent raises the number of commuters between regions by 0.25 percent. This effect is mainly driven by workers changing jobs to smaller cities while keeping their place of residence in larger ones. Our findings support the notion that benefits from infrastructure investments accrue in particular to peripheral regions, which gain access to a large pool of qualified workers with a preference for urban life. We find that the introduction of high-speed trains led to a modal shift towards rail transportation in particular on medium distances between 150 and 400 kilometers.

Keywords: infrastructure; worker mobility; high-speed rail; Germany

JEL Codes: J61; R12; R23; R40


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
reduction in travel time (R41)increase in the number of commuters (R41)
introduction of HSR connections (L92)increase in the size of local labor markets (J49)
reduction in travel time (R41)increase in the share of rail-based commuting (R41)
introduction of HSR connections (L92)attract qualified workers to smaller cities (R23)
reduction in travel time (R41)change in jobs from larger to smaller cities (R23)
reduction in travel time (R41)heterogeneous effects on commuter numbers (R29)
HSR connections (L92)affect worker mobility (J62)

Back to index