Does Capital Scarcity Matter?

Working Paper: NBER ID: w23921

Authors: Anusha Chari; Peter Blair Henry; Racha Moussa

Abstract: This paper quantifies the welfare impact of a permanent increase in the level of per capita income brought about by a temporary increase in the growth rate of GDP per capita following capital account liberalization. In the immediate aftermath of liberalization, and under a range of assumptions, differences between the autarkic and integrated equilibrium consumption paths are large. Yet the welfare impact of these differences is small when using infinite horizon consumption streams to compute welfare gains. The results suggest that a finite horizon framework may be more appropriate and policy-relevant for evaluating the welfare consequences of economic policy changes that induce temporary growth effects but have a permanent impact on the level of per capita incomes.

Keywords: capital account liberalization; welfare impact; per capita income; economic growth; finite horizon

JEL Codes: F21; F30; F43; F6; G15


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
capital account liberalization (F32)temporary increase in growth rate of GDP per capita (O49)
temporary increase in growth rate of GDP per capita (O49)permanent increase in level of per capita income (F40)
capital account liberalization (F32)increase in consumption welfare (D11)
size of capital gap between autarky and integration (F12)welfare effects (D69)
infinite horizon models (C61)underestimate welfare gains from liberalization (D69)

Back to index