Working Paper: NBER ID: w23358
Authors: Arielle Bernhardt; Erica Field; Rohini Pande; Natalia Rigol
Abstract: Several field experiments fi nd positive returns to grants for male and not female micro-entrepreneurs. But, these analyses largely overlook that male and female micro-entrepreneurs often belong to the same household. Using data from randomized trials in India, Sri Lanka and Ghana, we show that the gender gap in microenterprise performance is not due to a gap in aptitude. Instead, low average returns of female-run enterprises are observed because women's capital is invested into their husbands' enterprises rather than their own. When women are the sole household enterprise operator, capital shocks lead to large increases in profits. Household-level income gains are equivalent regardless of the grant or loan recipient's gender.
Keywords: microfinance; female entrepreneurship; capital constraints; household investment; gender gap
JEL Codes: D1; H31; J16; O12
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| capital allocation (G31) | profits (male-operated enterprises) (D33) |
| household composition (D10) | investment outcomes (G11) |
| liquidity constraints (E41) | enterprise profits (D33) |
| grace period (Y60) | profits (female sole operators) (D33) |
| grace period (Y60) | profits (female multiple operators) (J54) |
| treatment (M53) | overall household profits (G59) |