Blind Tigers and Redtape Cocktails: Liquor Control and Homicide in Late Nineteenth-Century South Carolina

Working Paper: NBER ID: w22980

Authors: Howard Bodenhorn

Abstract: In 1893 South Carolina prohibited the private manufacture, transportation, and sale of alcohol and established a state monopoly in wholesale and retail alcohol distribution. The combination of a market decline in the availability of alcohol, reduced variety, and monopoly pricing at state-operated outlets encouraged black markets in alcohol. Because black market participants tend to resort to extra-legal mechanisms for dispute resolution, including violence, one result of South Carolina’s alcohol restriction was an increase in homicide. A continuous-treatment difference-in-difference approach reveals that homicide rates increased by about 30 to 60 percent in counties that more vigorously enforced the law.

Keywords: alcohol regulation; homicide rates; prohibition; black markets; South Carolina

JEL Codes: K14; K42; N41


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Liquor law enforcement (K40)Homicide prosecution rates (K42)
Establishment of state monopoly on alcohol sales in 1893 (L66)Homicide rates (J11)
Liquor law enforcement (K40)Black markets for alcohol (J46)
Black markets for alcohol (J46)Extralegal dispute resolution methods (including violence) (K41)
Liquor law enforcement (K40)Transformation of existing markets for alcohol (L66)
Transformation of existing markets for alcohol (L66)Increased violence (D74)

Back to index