Borrowing Requirements, Credit Access, and Adverse Selection: Evidence from Kenya

Working Paper: NBER ID: w22686

Authors: William Jack; Michael Kremer; Joost De Laat; Tavneet Suri

Abstract: Do the stringent formal sector borrowing requirements common in many developing countries restrict credit access, technology adoption, and welfare? When a Kenyan dairy's savings and credit cooperative randomly offered some farmers the opportunity to replace loans with high down payments and stringent guarantor requirements with loans collateralized by the asset itself — a large water tank — loan take-up increased from 2.4% to 41.9%. (In contrast, substituting joint liability requirements for deposit requirements did not affect loan take up.) There were no repossessions among farmers allowed to collateralize 75% of their loans, and there was only a 0.7% repossession rate among those offered 96% asset collateralization. A Karlan-Zinman test based on waiving borrowing requirements ex post finds evidence of adverse selection with lowered deposit requirements, but not of moral hazard. A simple model and rough calibration suggests that adverse selection may deter lenders from making welfare-improving loans with lower deposit requirements, even after introducing asset collateralization. We estimate that 2/3 of marginal loans led to increased water storage investment. Real effects of loosening borrowing requirements include increased household water access, reductions in child time spent on water-related tasks, and greater school enrollment for girls.

Keywords: credit access; borrowing requirements; adverse selection; Kenya; water tanks

JEL Codes: O13; O16


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
borrowing requirement type (F34)loan take-up rate (G21)
asset collateralization (G32)loan take-up rate (G21)
asset collateralization (G32)repossession rate (G21)
loan take-up rate (G21)investments in water storage (Q25)
investments in water storage (Q25)household water access (Q25)
investments in water storage (Q25)reduced child labor in water collection (J82)
investments in water storage (Q25)increased school enrollment for girls (I24)
high deposit requirements (G21)adverse selection (D82)

Back to index