Why Do Estimates of the EMU Effect on Trade Vary So Much?

Working Paper: NBER ID: w22678

Authors: Andrew K. Rose

Abstract: Larger data sets, with more countries and a longer span of time, exhibit systematically larger effects of European monetary union on trade. I establish this stylized fact with meta-analysis and confirm it by estimating a plain-vanilla gravity model. I then explain this finding by examining systematic biases in “multilateral resistance to trade” manifest in time-varying country fixed effects; bias grows as the sample is truncated by dropping small poor countries.

Keywords: EMU; Trade; Meta-analysis; Gravity model

JEL Codes: F14; F33


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Larger datasets (C55)Higher estimates of the EMU effect on trade (F17)
Dropping small and poor countries (O54)Biases estimates downward (C51)
Including all available data (Y10)Accurate estimates of the EMU trade effect (F17)
Sample size increases (C83)EMU stimulates trade significantly (F10)

Back to index