Identification of Dynamic Latent Factor Models: The Implications of Renormalization in a Model of Child Development

Working Paper: NBER ID: w22441

Authors: Francesco Agostinelli; Matthew Wiswall

Abstract: A recent and growing area of research applies latent factor models to study the development of children's skills. Some normalization is required in these models because the latent variables have no natural units and no known location or scale. We show that the standard practice of “re-normalizing” the latent variables each period is over-identifying and restrictive when used simultaneously with common skill production technologies that already have a known location and scale (KLS). The KLS class of functions include the Constant Elasticity of Substitution (CES) production technologies several papers use in their estimation. We show that these KLS production functions are already restricted in the sense that their location and scale is known (does not need to be identified and estimated) and therefore further restrictions on location and scale by re-normalizing the model each period is unnecessary and over-identifying. The most common type of re-normalization restriction imposes that latent skills are mean log-stationary, which restricts the class of CES technologies to be of the log-linear (Cobb-Douglas) sub-class, and does not allow for more general forms of complementarities. Even when a mean log-stationary model is correctly assumed, re-normalization can further bias the estimates of the skill production function. We support our analytic results through a series of Monte Carlo exercises. We show that in typical cases, estimators based on “re-normalizations” are biased, and simple alternative estimators, which do not impose these restrictions, can recover the underlying primitive parameters of the production technology.

Keywords: Child Development; Latent Factor Models; Skill Production Technologies; Normalization; Estimation Bias

JEL Codes: C38; J13


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
renormalization (C62)bias in estimation of skill production function (C51)
renormalization (C62)different estimates based on chosen measures (C13)
estimators based on renormalization (C51)biased (D91)
alternative estimators (C51)accurately recover underlying parameters (C51)
KLS functions (E12)no need for additional normalization (C29)
renormalization (C62)restricts class of technologies (L96)

Back to index