Meta-Analysis and Public Policy: Reconciling the Evidence on Deworming

Working Paper: NBER ID: w22382

Authors: Kevin Croke; Joan Hamory Hicks; Eric Hsu; Michael Kremer; Ricardo Maertens; Edward Miguel; Witold Wicek

Abstract: The WHO recommends mass drug administration (MDA) for intestinal worm infections in areas with >20% infection prevalence. Recent Cochrane meta-analyses endorse treatment of infected individuals but recommend against MDA. We conducted a theory-agnostic random-effects meta-analysis of the effect of multiple-dose MDA and a cost-effectiveness analysis. We estimate significant effects of MDA on child weight (0.15 kg, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.24; p <0.001), mid-upper arm circumference (0.20 cm, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.37; p=0.02), and height (0.09 cm, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.16; p=0.02) when prevalence is over 20%, but not on Hb (0.06 g/dl, 95% CI: -0.01, 0.14; p=0.1). These results suggest that MDA is a cost-effective intervention, particularly in the settings where it is recommended by the WHO.

Keywords: Deworming; Mass Drug Administration; Child Health; Cost-Effectiveness; Meta-Analysis

JEL Codes: C49; I15; I18; O15


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
MDA (Y10)child weight (J13)
MDA (Y10)MUAC (J51)
MDA (Y10)height (Y60)
MDA (Y10)hemoglobin (Y60)

Back to index