Faculty Preferences Over Unionization: Evidence from Open Letters at Two Research Universities

Working Paper: NBER ID: w22149

Authors: Joel Waldfogel

Abstract: What determines employee preferences for unionizing their workplaces? A substantial literature addresses this question with surveys on worker attitudes and pay. Unionization drives at the Universities of Minnesota and Washington have given rise to open letters of support or opposition from over 1,000 faculty at Washington and support from over 200 at Minnesota. Combining these expressions with publicly available data on salary, job titles, department affiliation, research productivity, teaching success, and political contributions from over 5,000 faculty, we provide new estimates of the determinants of faculty preferences for unionization at research universities. We find that faculty with higher pay and greater research productivity are less supportive of unionization, even after controlling for job title and department. Attitudes matter as well: after accounting for pay and productivity, faculty in fields documented elsewhere to have more politically liberal participants are more likely to support unionization.

Keywords: Unionization; Faculty Preferences; Research Universities

JEL Codes: J51; K31


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Higher Salary (J31)Lower Support for Unionization (J58)
Higher Research Productivity (D29)Lower Support for Unionization (J58)
More Politically Liberal Fields (K19)Higher Support for Unionization (J50)

Back to index