The Limits of Meritocracy: Screening Bureaucrats under Imperfect Verifiability

Working Paper: NBER ID: w21963

Authors: Juan Carlos Surez Serrato; Xiao Yu Wang; Shuang Zhang

Abstract: Does bureaucratic ability predict promotion in governments? We show that self-reported performance in enforcing the One Child Policy predicts mayoral promotion in China. However, misreporting handicaps screening—a non-manipulated performance measure does not predict promotion. We show that this is consistent with a model where a government has a meritocratic objective but underestimates the imperfect verifiability of performance, rather than a model where a government is only interested in the illusion of meritocracy. Thus, despite meritocratic intentions, we challenge the notion that a successful promotion system effectively substituted for democratic institutions in explaining Chinese growth.

Keywords: No keywords provided

JEL Codes: D23; D73; D86; M12; M51; O12; O15; O53; P23; P26; P48


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
actual OCP performance (D29)promotion likelihood (M51)
competitiveness of promotion environment (L11)predictive power of OCP performance for promotion (L25)
manipulation of performance metrics (C90)effectiveness of promotion system (M51)
self-reported OCP performance (L25)actual OCP performance (D29)
self-reported OCP performance (L25)promotion likelihood (M51)

Back to index