Decision-Making Approaches and the Propensity to Default: Evidence and Implications

Working Paper: NBER ID: w20949

Authors: Jeffrey R. Brown; Anne M. Farrell; Scott J. Weisbenner

Abstract: This paper examines heterogeneity in the responsiveness to default options in a large state retirement plan, focusing on individuals’ decision-making approaches as well as their economic and demographic characteristics. Using a survey of plan participants, we find that procrastination and the need for cognitive closure are important determinants of the likelihood of default. We also explore an important implication of defaulting – individuals who default are significantly more likely to subsequently express a desire to enroll in a different plan. The desire to change plans is also correlated with numerous economic and decision-making characteristics, including procrastination.

Keywords: default options; behavioral economics; retirement planning

JEL Codes: D03; D14; G11


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Procrastination (D15)Likelihood of Default (G33)
Need for Cognitive Closure (D80)Likelihood of Default (G33)

Back to index