Assessing the Energy Efficiency Gap

Working Paper: NBER ID: w20904

Authors: Todd D. Gerarden; Richard G. Newell; Robert N. Stavins

Abstract: Energy-efficient technologies offer considerable promise for reducing the financial costs and environmental damages associated with energy use, but these technologies appear not to be adopted by consumers and businesses to the degree that would apparently be justified, even on a purely financial basis. We present two complementary frameworks for understanding this so-called “energy paradox” or “energy-efficiency gap.” First, we build on the previous literature by dividing potential explanations for the energy-efficiency gap into three categories: market failures, behavioral anomalies, and model and measurement errors. Second, we posit that it is useful to think in terms of the fundamental elements of cost-minimizing energy-efficiency decisions. This provides a decomposition that organizes thinking around four questions. First, are product offerings and pricing economically efficient? Second, are energy operating costs inefficiently priced and/or understood? Third, are product choices cost-minimizing in present value terms? Fourth, do other costs inhibit more energy-efficient decisions? We review empirical evidence on these questions, with an emphasis on recent advances, and offer suggestions for future research.

Keywords: Energy Efficiency; Market Failures; Behavioral Economics; Energy Policy

JEL Codes: L00; Q4; Q48; Q5


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
market failures (D52)underinvestment in energy-efficient technologies (Q41)
information problems (D83)market failures (D52)
asymmetric information (D82)market failures (D52)
principal-agent issues (D82)market failures (D52)
environmental externalities (D62)market failures (D52)
behavioral anomalies (D91)suboptimal adoption of energy-efficient technologies (Q41)
myopia (E71)behavioral anomalies (D91)
bounded rationality (D01)behavioral anomalies (D91)
model and measurement errors (C52)misjudgments about the energy efficiency gap (Q41)
incorrect assumptions about costs and benefits (D61)model and measurement errors (C52)

Back to index