Is Government Spending at the Zero Lower Bound Desirable?

Working Paper: NBER ID: w20687

Authors: Florin O. Bilbiie; Tommaso Monacelli; Roberto Perotti

Abstract: Government spending at the zero lower bound (ZLB) is not necessarily welfare enhancing, even when its output multiplier is large. We illustrate this point in the context of a standard New Keynesian model. In that model, when government spending provides direct utility to the household, its optimal level is at most 0.5-1 percent of GDP for recessions of -4 percent; the numbers are higher for deeper recessions. When spending does not provide direct utility, it is generically welfare-detrimental: it should be kept unchanged at a long run-optimal value.

Keywords: Government Spending; Zero Lower Bound; Welfare Effects

JEL Codes: D91; E21; E62


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
government spending (H59)output (C67)
output (C67)real interest rate (E43)
real interest rate (E43)consumption (E21)
output multiplier (E23)welfare effects (D69)
government spending (H59)optimal increase in government spending (E62)
wasteful government spending (H56)welfare effect (D69)
optimal level of wasteful spending (D61)welfare effect (D69)

Back to index