Improving Educational Outcomes in Developing Countries: Lessons from Rigorous Impact Evaluations

Working Paper: NBER ID: w20284

Authors: Alejandro J. Ganimian; Richard J. Murnane

Abstract: This paper reviews and interprets the evidence from 223 rigorous impact evaluations of educational initiatives conducted in 56 low- and middle-income countries. We consider for inclusion in our review all studies in recent syntheses, which have reached seemingly conflicting conclusions about which interventions improve educational outcomes. We group interventions based on their theory of action. We derive four lessons from the studies we review. First, reducing the costs of going to school and expanding schooling options increase attendance and attainment, but do not consistently increase student achievement. Second, providing information about school quality, developmentally appropriate parenting practices, and the economic returns to schooling affects the actions of parents and the achievement of children and adolescents. Third, more or better resources improve student achievement only if they result in changes in children’s daily experiences at school. Finally, well-designed incentives increase teacher effort and student achievement from very low levels, but low-skilled teachers need specific guidance to reach minimally acceptable levels of instruction.

Keywords: Educational Outcomes; Impact Evaluations; Developing Countries

JEL Codes: I21; I24; I25; I32


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
cost reduction (e.g., elimination of fees) (D40)attendance (I29)
cost reduction (e.g., elimination of fees) (D40)attainment (I24)
information dissemination (L86)parental actions (J12)
parental actions (J12)student achievement (I24)
improved resources (Q32)student achievement (I24)
improved resources (Q32)daily school experiences (I20)
daily school experiences (I20)student achievement (I24)
well-designed incentives (D47)teacher effort (D29)
well-designed incentives (D47)student achievement (I24)
low-skilled teachers require guidance (A21)effective utilization of incentives (O31)

Back to index