Maturity Rationing and Collective Shorttermism

Working Paper: NBER ID: w19946

Authors: Konstantin Milbradt; Martin Oehmke

Abstract: Financing terms and investment decisions are jointly determined. This interdependence links firms' asset and liability sides and can lead to short-termism in investment. In our model, financing frictions increase with the investment horizon, such that financing for long-term projects is relatively expensive and potentially rationed. In response, firms whose first-best investment opportunities are long-term may change their investments towards second-best projects of shorter maturities. This worsens financing terms for firms with shorter maturity projects, inducing them to change their investments as well. In equilibrium, investment is inefficiently short-term. Equilibrium asset-side adjustments by firms can amplify shocks and, while privately optimal, can be socially undesirable.

Keywords: Financing Frictions; Investment Decisions; Collective Shorttermism

JEL Codes: G11; G30; G31; G32


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
financing frictions (G19)investment decisions (G11)
difficult or expensive financing for long-term projects (G32)adjustments towards shorter-term projects (F32)
adjustments towards shorter-term projects (F32)inefficient short-term investment behavior (G40)
asset-side decisions of one firm (G32)financing terms available to other firms (G32)
adjustments towards shorter-term projects (F32)feedback loop affecting other firms (D21)
financing frictions (G19)collective short-termism in the market (G14)
adjustments towards shorter-term projects (F32)breakdown of financing across all maturities (G32)
private optimal decisions of firms (L21)socially undesirable outcomes (P37)
self-reinforcing nature of the externality (D62)amplifying shocks in the financial system (F65)

Back to index