The Dynamic Effects of Educational Accountability

Working Paper: NBER ID: w19915

Authors: Hugh Macartney

Abstract: This paper provides the first evidence that value-added education accountability schemes induce dynamic distortions. Extending earlier dynamic moral hazard models, I propose a new test for ratchet effects, showing that classroom inputs are distorted less when schools face a shorter horizon over which they can influence student performance. I then exploit grade span variation using rich educational data to credibly identify the extent of dynamic gaming, finding compelling evidence of ratchet effects based on a triple-differences approach. Further analysis indicates that these effects are driven primarily by effort distortions, with teacher reallocations playing a secondary role.

Keywords: educational accountability; ratchet effects; dynamic distortions; teacher effort; student performance

JEL Codes: D82; I21; J33; M52


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
value-added education accountability schemes (H52)dynamic distortions (C69)
shorter horizon to influence student performance (D29)distortions in classroom inputs decrease (D29)
shorter horizon to influence student performance (D29)higher teacher effort (D29)
K-5 schools (I21)higher teacher effort (D29)
dynamic distortions (C69)measurable differences in student performance (D29)
effort reallocations (D61)dynamic distortions (C69)

Back to index