On the Generalizability of Experimental Results in Economics: With a Response to Camerer

Working Paper: NBER ID: w19666

Authors: Omar Alubaydli; John A. List

Abstract: Economists are increasingly turning to the experimental method as a means to estimate causal effects. By using randomization to identify key treatment effects, theories previously viewed as untestable are now scrutinized, efficacy of public policies are now more easily verified, and stakeholders can swiftly add empirical evidence to aid their decision-making. This study provides an overview of experimental methods in economics, with a special focus on developing an economic theory of generalizability. Given that field experiments are in their infancy, our secondary focus pertains to a discussion of the various parameters that they identify, and how they add to scientific knowledge. We conclude that until we conduct more field experiments that build a bridge between the lab and the naturally-occurring settings of interest we cannot begin to make strong conclusions empirically on the crucial question of generalizability from the lab to the field.

Keywords: experimental economics; generalizability; causal inference; field experiments

JEL Codes: C9; C90; C91; C92; C93


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Laboratory experiments (C91)qualitative insights into treatment effects (C21)
Laboratory experiments (C91)less effective in delivering precise point estimates (C51)
Field experiments (C93)reduce selection bias (C52)
Natural field experiments (NFEs) (C93)yield more generalizable results (C90)
Experimental design (C90)affect observed behaviors (C92)
Context and stakes involved (D74)determine outcomes of experiments (C90)
Field experiments linking lab findings (C91)strong conclusions about generalizability (C12)

Back to index