Affirmative Action: One Size Does Not Fit All

Working Paper: NBER ID: w19546

Authors: Kala Krishna; Alexander Tarasov

Abstract: This paper identifies a new reason for giving preferences to the disadvantaged using a model of contests. There are two forces at work: the effort effect working against giving preferences and the selection effect working for them. When education is costly and easy to obtain (as in the U.S.), the selection effect dominates. When education is heavily subsidized and limited in supply (as in India), preferences are welfare reducing. The model also shows that unequal treatment of identical agents can be welfare improving, providing insights into when the counterintuitive policy of rationing educational access to some subgroups is welfare improving.

Keywords: affirmative action; preferences; welfare; education; selection effect; effort effect

JEL Codes: D61; I23


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Affirmative action in costly education contexts (like the U.S.) (I24)Welfare improvements (I38)
Affirmative action in subsidized education contexts (like India) (I24)Welfare reduction (I38)
Unequal treatment of identical agents (C78)Welfare improvements under certain conditions (D69)
Context of education (I24)Effectiveness of affirmative action (J78)

Back to index