Working Paper: NBER ID: w19545
Authors: James M. Sallee
Abstract: If time and effort are required to accurately ascertain the lifetime value of energy efficiency for a durable good, consumers might rationally ignore energy efficiency. This paper argues that such inattention may be rational in the market for automobiles and home appliances. To do so, it develops a heuristic model of a consumer's decision problem when purchasing an energy consuming durable good in which uncertainty about each good's energy efficiency can be resolved via costly effort. The model indicates under what conditions the consumer will be less likely to undertake this effort. The empirical portion of the paper argues that energy efficiency is often not pivotal to choice. This, along with a simulation of the automobile market, suggests that returns to paying attention to energy may be modest, and analysis of the information readily available to consumers suggests that the costs of being fully informed may be substantial. The paper discusses the implications of rational inattention for public policy and for empirical research on the energy paradox.
Keywords: Rational Inattention; Energy Efficiency; Consumer Behavior; Public Policy
JEL Codes: D03; H23; Q48
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| cost of acquiring information (D83) | attention to energy efficiency (Q41) |
| variance in unknown energy costs (Q41) | attention to energy efficiency (Q41) |
| attention to energy efficiency (Q41) | welfare loss (D69) |
| incomplete and biased information (D83) | attention to energy efficiency (Q41) |
| misperception of fuel economy (Q41) | welfare loss (D69) |
| welfare loss (D69) | societal costs (J32) |