Working Paper: NBER ID: w19154
Authors: Meghan R. Busse; Ayelet Israeli; Florian Zettelmeyer
Abstract: In this paper we investigate whether sellers treat consumers differently on the basis of how well-informed consumers appear to be. We implement a large-scale field experiment in which callers request price quotes from automotive repair shops. We show that sellers alter their initial price quotes depending on whether consumers appear to be well-informed, uninformed, or poorly informed about market prices. We find that repair shops quote higher prices to callers who cite a higher expected price. We find that women are quoted higher prices than men when callers signal that they are uninformed about market prices. However, gender differences disappear when callers mention an expected price for the repair. Finally, we find that repair shops are more likely to offer a price concession if asked to do so by a woman than a man.
Keywords: Price Expectations; Auto Repair; Field Experiment; Consumer Behavior; Gender Discrimination
JEL Codes: D12; D83
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
Cause | Effect |
---|---|
Communicated expected price (G13) | Quoted price (D44) |
Higher expected price (G19) | Higher quoted price (D44) |
Gender of caller (J16) | Quoted price (D44) |
Uninformed status of caller (D89) | Quoted price (D44) |
Quoted price (D44) | Price concession (D43) |
Gender of caller (J16) | Price concession (D43) |