Working Paper: NBER ID: w18029
Authors: Rahul Deb; Robert S. Gazzale; Matthew J. Kotchen
Abstract: A large economics literature seeks to understand the reasons why individuals make charitable contributions. Fundamental features of most models of charitable giving are the inclusion of externalities induced by other agents and the Lancasterian characteristics approach to specifying utility functions. This paper develops a general, revealed-preference methodology for testing a variety of preference structures that allow for both externalities and characteristics. The tests are simple linear programs that are transparent, computationally efficient, and straightforward to implement. We show how the technique applies to standard models of privately provided public goods and novel models that account for social comparisons based on relative consumption and donations among individuals. We also conduct an original experiment that enables nonparametric tests of many models on a single data set. The results provide the first revealed-preference evidence on the importance of social comparisons when individuals make charitable contributions. Models that include preferences for either relative consumption or donations yield greater explanatory power than the standard model of impure altruism.
Keywords: charitable giving; revealed preference; social comparisons; experimental evidence
JEL Codes: C91; D01; D64; H41
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
Cause | Effect |
---|---|
social comparisons (C92) | charitable contributions (D64) |
relative donations (D64) | choices (Y60) |
relative private consumption (D10) | choices (Y60) |
impure altruism (D64) | choices (Y60) |
social comparisons (C92) | understanding charitable behavior (D64) |