Why Don't Women Patent?

Working Paper: NBER ID: w17888

Authors: Jennifer Hunt; Jean-Philippe Garant; Hannah Herman; David J. Munroe

Abstract: We investigate women's underrepresentation among holders of commercialized patents: only 5.5% of holders of such patents are female. Using the National Survey of College Graduates 2003, we find only 7% of the gap is accounted for by women's lower probability of holding any science or engineering degree, because women with such a degree are scarcely more likely to patent than women without. Differences among those without a science or engineering degree account for 15%, while 78% is accounted for by differences among those with a science or engineering degree. For the latter group, we find that women's underrepresentation in engineering and in jobs involving development and design explain much of the gap; closing it would increase U.S. GDP per capita by 2.7%.

Keywords: patenting; gender gap; innovation; science and engineering; economic growth

JEL Codes: J7; O31


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Educational attainment in science and engineering degrees (I23)Women's patenting rates (J16)
Differences in patenting rates among degree holders (O39)Gender gap in commercialized patents (J16)
Underrepresentation in engineering and jobs involving development and design (O29)Gender gap in patenting rates for women with science or engineering degrees (J16)
Closing the patenting shortfall of female holders of science and engineering degrees (I24)Increase in GDP per capita (O49)
Job characteristics (M54)Women's patenting rates (J16)

Back to index