Do Stronger Age Discrimination Laws Make Social Security Reforms More Effective?

Working Paper: NBER ID: w17467

Authors: David Neumark; Joanne Song

Abstract: Supply-side Social Security reforms intended to increase employment and delay benefit claiming among older individuals may be frustrated by age discrimination. We test for policy complementarities between these reforms and demand-side efforts to deter age discrimination, specifically studying whether stronger state-level age discrimination protections enhanced the impact of the 1983 Social Security reforms that increased the Full Retirement Age (FRA) and reduced benefits. The evidence indicates that, for older individuals for whom early retirement benefits fell and the FRA increased, stronger state age discrimination protections were associated with delayed benefit claiming and increases in employment, with benefit claiming pushed from 65 to the new FRA, and increased employment after age 62 and age 65 that is then curtailed at the new FRA.

Keywords: Age Discrimination; Social Security Reforms; Labor Supply; Employment; Older Workers

JEL Codes: H55; J14; J71; J78; K31


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Stronger state age discrimination protections (J78)Delayed benefit claiming (H55)
Stronger state age discrimination protections (J78)Shift in claiming behavior to new FRA (G40)
Stronger state age discrimination protections (J78)Higher employment rates among older individuals (J26)
1983 social security reforms (H55)Delayed benefit claiming (H55)
1983 social security reforms (H55)Higher employment rates among older individuals (J26)

Back to index