Working Paper: NBER ID: w17382
Authors: Dora Costa
Abstract: The US Civil War provides researchers a unique opportunity to identify wartime leaders and thus to test theories of leadership. By observing both leaders and followers during the war and forty years after it, I establish that the most able became wartime leaders, that leading by example from the front was an effective strategy in reducing desertion rates, and that leaders later migrated to the larger cities because this is where their superior skills would have had the highest pay-offs. I find that US cities were magnets for the most able and provided training opportunities for both leaders and followers: men might start in a low social status occupation in a city but then move to a higher status occupation.
Keywords: No keywords provided
JEL Codes: M5; N31
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| Ability (G53) | Leadership Position (M54) |
| Leadership Style (leading from the front) (M54) | Desertion Rates (J63) |
| Leadership Position (M54) | Migration to Larger Cities (R23) |
| Leadership Position (M54) | Socioeconomic Outcomes in Urban Settings (R23) |