Self-Reported Disability and Reference Groups

Working Paper: NBER ID: w17153

Authors: Arthur van Soest; Tatiana Andreyeva; Arie Kapteyn; James P. Smith

Abstract: Social networks and social interactions affect individual and social norms. We develop a direct test of this using Dutch survey data on how respondents evaluate work disability of hypothetical people with some work related health problem (vignettes). We analyze how the thresholds respondents use to decide what constitutes a (mild or more serious) work disability depend on the number of people receiving disability insurance benefits (DI) in their reference group. We find that reference group effects are significant and contribute substantially to an explanation of why self-reported work disability in the Netherlands is much higher than in, for example, the US.

Keywords: Disability Insurance; Social Norms; Self-Reported Disability; Reference Groups

JEL Codes: J14; J21; J68


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Reference group DI receipt (D16)self-reported work disability (J14)
Acquaintance with DI recipients (F35)reporting thresholds for work disability (J28)
Reference group DI receipt (D16)reporting thresholds for work disability (J28)

Back to index