Why is an Elite Undergraduate Education Valuable? Evidence from Israel

Working Paper: NBER ID: w16730

Authors: Kevin Lang; Erez Siniver

Abstract: In this paper we compare the labor market performance of Israeli students who graduated from one of the leading universities, Hebrew University (HU), with those who graduated from a professional undergraduate college, College of Management Academic Studies (COMAS). Our results support a model in which employers have good information about the quality of HU graduates and pay them according to their ability, but in which the market has relatively little information about COMAS graduates. Hence, high-skill COMAS graduates are initially treated as if they were the average COMAS graduate, who is weaker than a HU graduate, consequently earning less than UH graduates. However, over time the market differentiates among them so that after several years of experience, COMAS and HU graduates with similar entry scores have similar earnings. Our results are therefore consistent with the view that employers use education information to screen workers but that the market acquires information fairly rapidly.

Keywords: elite education; labor market outcomes; Israel; higher education; employer learning

JEL Codes: I21; J24; J3


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
informational asymmetry (D82)initial lower earnings for high-skill COMAS graduates (J24)
market learning about COMAS graduates (M59)convergence of earnings with HU graduates (J39)
initial earnings gap diminishes (J31)employers adjust perceptions based on experience and performance (M51)
HU graduates (Y40)higher initial earnings (J31)

Back to index