Heterogeneity and Risk Sharing in Village Economies

Working Paper: NBER ID: w16696

Authors: Pierre-André Chiappori; Krislert Samphantharak; Sam Schulhofer-Wohl; Robert M. Townsend

Abstract: We measure heterogeneity in risk aversion among households in Thai villages using a full risk-sharing model and complement the results with a measure based on optimal portfolio choice. Among households with relatives living in the same village, full insurance cannot be rejected, suggesting that relatives provide something close to a complete-markets consumption allocation. There is substantial heterogeneity in risk preferences estimated from the full-insurance model, positively correlated in most villages with portfolio-choice estimates. The heterogeneity matters for policy: Although the average household would benefit from eliminating village-level risk, less-risk-averse households who are paid to absorb that risk would be worse off.

Keywords: risk aversion; risk sharing; portfolio choice; village economies; Thailand

JEL Codes: D12; D14; D53; D81; D91; G11; O16


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
strong consumption co-movement with aggregate consumption (E20)relatively less risk averse (D81)
individual consumption depends solely on aggregate shocks (E20)deviations indicate lack of full insurance (G52)
full insurance cannot be rejected for households with kin in the village (G52)consumption allocation akin to complete markets (D10)
full insurance is rejected for households without kin (G52)informal institutions play a critical role in risk-sharing (O17)
heterogeneity in risk preferences (D81)welfare implications of risk-sharing policies must consider diverse impacts (G52)
average household would benefit from eliminating village-level risk (R20)less risk-averse households would experience welfare losses (D11)
individual income shocks should not significantly affect consumption under full insurance (G52)weak relationship between income and consumption (E21)

Back to index