Working Paper: NBER ID: w16517
Authors: Peter Arcidiacono; Andrew W. Beauchamp; Marjorie B. McElroy
Abstract: We develop a directed search model of relationship formation which can disentangle male and female preferences for types of partners and for different relationship terms using only a cross-section of observed matches. Individuals direct their search to a particular type of match on the basis of (i) the terms of the relationship, (ii) the type of partner, and (iii) the endogenously determined probability of matching. If men outnumber women, they tend to trade a low probability of a preferred match for a high probability of a less-preferred match; the analogous statement holds for women. Using data from National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health we estimate the equilibrium matching model with high school relationships. Variation in gender ratios is used to uncover male and female preferences. Estimates from the structural model match subjective data on whether sex would occur in one's ideal relationship. The equilibrium result shows that some women would ideally not have sex, but do so out of matching concerns; the reverse is true for men.
Keywords: relationship formation; gender ratios; preferences; matching; adolescent health
JEL Codes: C35; J13; J16
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| gender ratios (J16) | probability of matching (C78) |
| gender ratios (J16) | sexual relationships (J12) |
| probability of matching (C78) | relationship terms (L14) |
| gender ratios (J16) | preferences (D11) |
| preferences (D11) | relationship behaviors (C92) |
| gender ratios (J16) | sexual behavior (J13) |
| men's preferences (D11) | sexual relationships (J12) |
| women's preferences (J16) | sexual relationships (J12) |