Labor Market Heterogeneity, Aggregation, and the Lucas Critique

Working Paper: NBER ID: w16401

Authors: Yongsung Chang; Sunbin Kim; Frank Schorfheide

Abstract: This paper assesses biases in policy predictions due to the lack of invariance of "structural'' parameters in representative-agent models. We simulate data under various fiscal policy regimes from a heterogeneous-agents economy with incomplete asset markets and indivisible labor supply. Imperfect aggregation manifests itself through preference shocks in the estimated representative-agent model. Preference and technology parameter estimates are not invariant with respect to policy changes. As a result, the bias in the representative-agent model's policy predictions is large compared to the length of predictive intervals that reflect parameter uncertainty.

Keywords: Labor Market Heterogeneity; Aggregation; Lucas Critique; Fiscal Policy

JEL Codes: C11; C32; E32; E62


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
fiscal policy changes (E62)parameters of representative-agent models (E13)
lack of policy invariance (C54)inaccurate predictions from representative-agent model (E17)
predicted effects of fiscal policy changes (H30)actual outcomes in heterogeneous agents economy (D29)
preference shocks (D11)hours worked (J22)
fiscal policy regime (E63)aggregate labor supply elasticity (J20)
cross-sectional distribution of reservation wages (J31)aggregate labor supply elasticity (J20)

Back to index