Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects of Medicaid Expansions on Takeup and Crowdout

Working Paper: NBER ID: w16112

Authors: John C. Ham; Serkan Ozbeklik; Lara Shoresheppard

Abstract: Economists have devoted considerable resources to estimating local average treatment effects of expansions in Medicaid eligibility for children. In this paper we use random coefficients linear probability models and switching probit models to estimate a more complete range of effects of Medicaid expansion on Medicaid take-up and crowd-out of private insurance. We demonstrate how to estimate, for Medicaid expansions, the average effect among all of those eligible, the average effect for a randomly chosen person, the effect for a marginally eligible child, and the average effect for those affected by a nonmarginal counterfactual policy change. We then estimate the average effect of Medicaid expansions among all eligible children and the average effect for those affected by a nonmarginal counterfactual Medicaid expansion since these are likely to be the most useful for policy analysis. Estimated take-up rates among average eligible children are substantially larger than take-up rates for those made eligible by a counterfactual Medicaid expansion, moreover both of these effects vary widely across demographic groups. In terms of crowd-out, we find statistically significant, though small, effects for all eligible children, but not for those affected by a counterfactual policy change.

Keywords: Medicaid; Takeup; Crowdout; Health Insurance; Public Policy

JEL Codes: H42; I1; I38


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Medicaid expansions (I18)higher takeup rates among eligible children (I24)
Medicaid expansions (I18)differential responses to eligibility changes (J65)
Medicaid expansions (I18)crowdout effects (D26)
higher takeup rates among eligible children (I24)crowdout effects (D26)

Back to index