Is the Spurious Regression Problem Spurious?

Working Paper: NBER ID: w15690

Authors: Bennett T. McCallum

Abstract: So-called "spurious regression" relationships between random-walk (or strongly autoregressive) variables are generally accompanied by clear signs of severe autocorrelation in their residuals. A conscientious researcher would therefore not end an investigation with such a result, but would likely re-estimate with an autocorrelation correction. Simulations show, for several typical cases, that the test-rejection statistics for the re-estimated relationships are very close to the true values, so do not yield results of the spurious type.

Keywords: No keywords provided

JEL Codes: C22; C29


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
spurious regression relationships between random walk or strongly autoregressive variables (C22)significant autocorrelation in their residuals (C22)
significant autocorrelation in their residuals (C22)false significant relationship (C52)
autocorrelation (C22)reestimate regression using iterated Cochrane-Orcutt procedure (C51)
correcting for autocorrelation (C22)rejection frequencies of the null hypothesis approach true significance levels (C12)
integrated moving-average variables (C32)simple autoregressive corrections may not suffice (C22)

Back to index