Tiebreaker Certification and Multiple Credit Ratings

Working Paper: NBER ID: w15331

Authors: Dion Bongaerts; K.J. Martijn Cremers; William N. Goetzmann

Abstract: This paper explores the economic role credit rating agencies play in the corporate bond market. We consider three existing theories about multiple ratings: information production, rating shopping and regulatory certification. Using differences in rating composition, default prediction and credit spread changes, our evidence only supports regulatory certification. Marginal, additional credit ratings are more likely to occur because of, and seem to matter primarily for regulatory purposes, but do not seem to provide significant additional information related to credit quality.

Keywords: No keywords provided

JEL Codes: G12; G14; G24


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Addition of a Fitch rating (G24)Regulatory rating improvement (G18)
Fitch rating as investment grade (G24)Decrease in credit spreads (G19)
Expectations of volatility in ratings (G17)Desire to obtain additional ratings (G24)
Fitch rating (G24)Regulatory certification hypothesis dominates information production hypothesis (G18)

Back to index