Some Unpleasant General Equilibrium Implications of Executive Incentive Compensation Contracts

Working Paper: NBER ID: w15165

Authors: John B. Donaldson; Natalia Gershun; Marc P. Giannoni

Abstract: We consider a simple variant of the standard real business cycle model in which shareholders hire a self-interested executive to manage the firm on their behalf. Delegation gives rise to a generic conflict of interest mediated by a convex (option-like) compensation contract which is able to align the interests of managers and their shareholders. With such a compensation contract, a given increase in the firm's output generated by an additional unit of physical investment results in a more than proportional increase in the manager's income. We find that incentive contracts of this form can easily result in an indeterminate general equilibrium, with business cycles driven by self-fulfilling fluctuations in the manager's expectations. These expectations are unrelated to fundamentals. Arbitrarily large fluctuations in macroeconomic variables may possibly result.

Keywords: Executive Compensation; General Equilibrium; Business Cycles; Convex Contracts

JEL Codes: E32; J33


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
additional investment (G31)manager's income (M12)
convex executive compensation contracts (M12)manager's behavior regarding investment decisions (G11)
manager's beliefs about future returns (G17)current consumption and investment decisions (E20)
convex executive compensation contracts (M12)sunspot equilibria (D50)
managerial expectations (D84)macroeconomic volatility (E32)
degree of contract convexity (D86)indeterminate equilibria (D59)

Back to index