Working Paper: NBER ID: w15057
Authors: Rema Hanna; Leigh Linden
Abstract: In this paper, we illustrate a methodology to measure discrimination in educational contexts. In India, we ran an exam competition through which children compete for a large financial prize. We recruited teachers to grade the exams. We then randomly assigned child "characteristics" (age, gender, and caste) to the cover sheets of the exams to ensure that there is no systematic relationship between the characteristics observed by the teachers and the quality of the exams. We find that teachers give exams that are assigned to be lower caste scores that are about 0.03 to 0.09 standard deviations lower than exams that are assigned to be high caste. The effect is small relative to the real differences in scores between the high and lower caste children. Low-performing, low caste children and top-performing females tend to lose out the most due to discrimination. Interestingly, we find that the discrimination against low caste students is driven by low caste teachers, while teachers who belong to higher caste groups do not appear to discriminate at all. This result runs counter to the previous literature, which tends to find that individuals discriminate in favor of members of their own groups.
Keywords: discrimination; education; caste; India
JEL Codes: I2; J16
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
Cause | Effect |
---|---|
Teachers exhibit discrimination against lower caste students (J15) | Exams assigned to lower caste students receive scores that are approximately 0.03 to 0.09 standard deviations lower than those assigned to higher caste students (I24) |
Low caste teachers (I24) | Discrimination against low caste students (J15) |
Teachers less confident in grading instrument (A00) | Discrimination appears to be more pronounced in the early stages of grading (J71) |
Exam scores of low caste students (I24) | Actual differences in scores between high and low caste children (I24) |