Myth and Reality of Flat Tax Reform: Micro Estimates of Tax Evasion Response and Welfare Effects in Russia

Working Paper: NBER ID: w13719

Authors: Yuriy Gorodnichenko; Jorge Martinez-Vazquez; Klara Sabirianova Peter

Abstract: Using micro-level data, we examine the effects of Russia's 2001 flat rate income tax reform on consumption, income, and tax evasion. We use the gap between household expenditures and reported earnings as a proxy for tax evasion with data from a household panel for 1998-2004. Utilizing difference-in-difference and regression-discontinuity-type approaches, we find that large and significant changes in tax evasion following the flat tax reform are associated with changes in voluntary compliance and cannot be explained by changes in tax enforcement policies. We also find the productivity response of taxpayers to the flat tax reform is small relative to the tax evasion response. Finally, we develop a feasible framework to assess the deadweight loss from personal income tax in the presence of tax evasion based on the consumption response to tax changes. We show that because of the strong tax evasion response the efficiency gain from the Russian flat tax reform is at least 30% smaller than the gain implied by conventional approaches.

Keywords: flat tax; tax evasion; Russia; welfare effects; micro-level data

JEL Codes: D73; H21; H24; H26; J3; O1; P2


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
decrease in consumption-income gap (F62)reduction in tax evasion (H26)
changes in tax rates (H29)tax evasion behavior (H26)
flat tax reform (H29)decrease in consumption-income gap (F62)
flat tax reform (H29)productivity response of taxpayers (H31)
flat tax reform (H29)welfare gains (D69)

Back to index