Innovation, Firm Dynamics, and International Trade

Working Paper: NBER ID: w13326

Authors: Andrew Atkeson; Ariel Burstein

Abstract: We present a general equilibrium model of the decisions of firms to innovate and to engage in international trade. We use the model to analyze the impact of a reduction in international trade costs on firms' process and product innovative activity. We first show analytically that if all firms export with equal intensity, then a reduction in international trade costs has no impact at all, in steady-state, on firms' investments in process innovation. We then show that if only a subset of firms export, a decline in marginal trade costs raises process innovation in exporting firms relative to that of non-exporting firms. This reallocation of process innovation reinforces existing patterns of comparative advantage, and leads to an amplified response of trade volumes and output over time. In a quantitative version of the model, we show that the increase in process innovation is largely offset by a decline in product innovation. We find that, even if process innovation is very elastic and leads to a large dynamic response of trade, output, consumption, and the firm size distribution, the dynamic welfare gains are very similar to those in a model with inelastic process innovation.

Keywords: Innovation; Firm Dynamics; International Trade

JEL Codes: F1; L11; L16; O3


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Reduction in international trade costs (F19)Increase in process innovation among exporting firms relative to non-exporting firms (O31)
All firms exporting with equal intensity (F12)No impact on firms' investments in process innovation in steady state (D25)
Decline in marginal trade costs (F12)Increase in process innovation among exporting firms relative to non-exporting firms (O31)
Increase in process innovation (O31)Decline in product innovation (O39)
Decline in product innovation (O39)No overall welfare gains (D69)

Back to index