Working Paper: NBER ID: w12807
Authors: Simeon Djankov; Oliver Hart; Caralee McLiesh; Andrei Shleifer
Abstract: We present insolvency practitioners from 88 countries with an identical case of a hotel about to default on its debt, and ask them to describe in detail how debt enforcement against this hotel will proceed in their countries. We use the data on time, cost, and the likely disposition of the assets (preservation as a going concern versus piecemeal sale) to construct a measure of the efficiency of debt enforcement in each country. We identify several characteristics of debt enforcement procedures, such as the structure of appeals and availability of floating charge finance, that influence efficiency. Our measure of efficiency of debt enforcement is strongly correlated with per capita income and legal origin and predicts debt market development across countries. Interestingly, it is also highly correlated with measures of the quality of contract enforcement and public regulation obtained in other studies.
Keywords: Debt Enforcement; Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Legal Origin; Per Capita Income
JEL Codes: G33; K12
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| efficiency of debt enforcement procedures (G33) | per capita income (D31) |
| per capita income (D31) | efficiency of debt enforcement procedures (G33) |
| legal origin (K20) | efficiency of debt enforcement procedures (G33) |
| efficiency of debt enforcement procedures (G33) | economic outcomes (F61) |
| legal origin (K20) | per capita income (D31) |
| presence of floating charge debt securities (G33) | efficiency of debt enforcement procedures (G33) |
| efficiency of debt enforcement procedures (G33) | debt market development (H63) |