Working Paper: NBER ID: w12509
Authors: Jeffrey L. Furman; Margaret K. Kyle; Iain Cockburn; Rebecca M. Henderson
Abstract: While there is widespread agreement among economists and management scholars that knowledge spillovers exist and have important economic consequences, researchers know substantially less about the "micro mechanisms" of spillovers -- about the degree to which they are geographically localized, for example, or about the degree to which spillovers from public institutions are qualitatively different from those from privately owned firms (Jaffe, 1986; Krugman, 1991; Jaffe et al., 1993; Porter, 1990). In this paper we make use of the geographic distribution of the research activities of major global pharmaceutical firms to explore the extent to which knowledge spills over from proximate private and public institutions. Our data and empirical approach allow us to make advances on two dimensions. First, by focusing on spillovers in research productivity (as opposed to manufacturing productivity), we build closely on the theoretical literature on spillovers that suggests that knowledge externalities are likely to have the most immediate impact on the production of ideas (Romer, 1986; Aghion & Howitt, 1997). Second, our data allow us to distinguish spillovers from public research from spillovers from private, or competitively funded research, and to more deeply explore the role that institutions and geographic proximity play in driving knowledge spillovers.
Keywords: No keywords provided
JEL Codes: L23; L65; O3; R3
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| Publicly authored research (O36) | Patent output (O34) |
| Privately authored research (H42) | Patent output (O34) |
| Exposure to publicly authored papers within thirty-five miles (R53) | Patent output (O34) |
| Exposure to privately authored work (A19) | Patent output (O34) |