Prices, Spatial Competition, and Heterogeneous Producers: An Empirical Test

Working Paper: NBER ID: w12231

Authors: Chad Syverson

Abstract: In markets where spatial competition is important, many models predict that average prices are lower in denser markets (i.e., those with more producers per unit area). Homogeneous-producer models attribute this effect solely to lower optimal markups. However, when producers instead differ in their production costs, a second mechanism also acts to lower equilibrium prices: competition-driven selection on costs. Consumers' greater substitution possibilities in denser markets make it more difficult for high-cost firms to profitably operate, truncating the equilibrium cost (and price) distributions from above. This selection process can be empirically distinguished from the homogenous-producer case because it implies that not only do average prices fall as density rises, but that upper-bound prices and price dispersion should also decline as well. I find empirical support for this process using a rich set of price data from U.S. readymixed concrete plants. Features of the industry offer an arguably exogenous source of producer density variation with which to identify these effects. I also show that the findings do not simply result from lower factor prices in dense markets, but rather because dense-market producers have low costs because they are more efficient.

Keywords: Spatial competition; Heterogeneous producers; Price dispersion; Producer density; Empirical test

JEL Codes: L0; L1; D4; L6


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
higher producer density (R32)lower equilibrium prices (D41)
increased producer density (R32)lower average prices (P22)
increased competition intensity (L13)lower equilibrium prices (D41)
competition-driven selection eliminates high-cost producers (L11)truncating the upper-bound price distribution (D39)
increased density (R23)decline in upper-bound prices (P22)
increased density (R23)decline in price dispersion (L11)

Back to index