Working Paper: NBER ID: w11974
Authors: James Poterba; Joshua Rauh; Steven Venti; David Wise
Abstract: This paper examines how different asset allocation strategies over the course of a worker's career affect the distribution of retirement wealth and the expected utility of wealth at retirement. It considers both rules that allocate a constant portfolio fraction to various assets at all ages, as well as "lifecycle" rules that vary the mix of portfolio assets as the worker ages. The analysis simulates retirement wealth using asset returns that are drawn from the historical return distribution. The results suggest that the distribution of retirement wealth associated with typical lifecycle investment strategies is similar to that from age-invariant asset allocation strategies that set the equity share of the portfolio equal to the average equity share in the lifecycle strategies. There is substantial variation across workers with different characteristics in the expected utility from following different asset allocation strategies. The expected utility associated with different 401(k) asset allocation strategies, and the ranking of these strategies, is very sensitive to three parameters: the expected return on corporate stock, the worker's relative risk aversion, and the amount of non-401(k) wealth that the worker will have available at retirement. At modest levels of risk aversion, or in the presence of substantial non-401(k) wealth at retirement, the historical pattern of stock and bond returns implies that the expected utility of an all-stock investment allocation rule is greater than that from any of the more conservative strategies. Higher risk aversion or lower expected returns on stocks raise the expected utility of following lifecycle strategies or other strategies that reduce equity exposure throughout the lifetime.
Keywords: 401k; asset allocation; retirement wealth; lifecycle funds
JEL Codes: J14; J32; G11; G23; H24
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
Cause | Effect |
---|---|
asset allocation strategies (G11) | retirement wealth (J26) |
expected return on corporate stock (G39) | expected utility from 401k strategies (G11) |
relative risk aversion (D11) | expected utility from 401k strategies (G11) |
non-401k wealth available at retirement (D14) | expected utility from 401k strategies (G11) |
risk aversion (modest levels) (D81) | expected utility of all-stock investment (G11) |
non-401k wealth (substantial) (G51) | expected utility of all-stock investment (G11) |
risk aversion (higher) (D81) | expected utility of lifecycle strategies (D15) |
expected returns on stocks (lower) (G17) | expected utility of lifecycle strategies (D15) |