Working Paper: NBER ID: w11798
Authors: Bruce A. Blonigen; Wesley W. Wilson
Abstract: The U.S. steel industry has long held that foreign subsidization and excess capacity has led to its long-run demise, yet no one has formally examined this hypothesis. In this paper, we incorporate foreign subsidization considerations into a model based on Staiger and Wolak's (1992) cyclical-dumping framework and illustrate testable implications of both cyclical excess capacity and structural excess capacity stemming from foreign subsidization. We then use detailed product- and foreign country-level data on steel exports to the U.S. market from 1979 through 2002 to estimate these excess capacity effects. The results provide strong evidence of both cyclical and structural excess capacity effects for exports to the U.S. market. However, the effects are confined to such a narrow range of country-product combinations that it is unlikely that such effects were a significant factor in the fortunes of U.S. steel firms over the past decades.
Keywords: Foreign Subsidization; Excess Capacity; U.S. Steel Industry
JEL Codes: F13; L11
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
| Cause | Effect |
|---|---|
| foreign subsidization (F23) | structural excess capacity (D24) |
| structural excess capacity (D24) | exports to the U.S. market (F10) |
| foreign subsidization (F23) | capacity investment by foreign firms (F23) |
| cyclical excess capacity (E22) | exports to the U.S. market (F10) |
| foreign subsidization exacerbates cyclical excess capacity effects (F14) | exports to the U.S. market (F10) |