Hard Targets: Theory and Evidence on Suicide Attacks

Working Paper: NBER ID: w11740

Authors: Eli Berman; David D. Laitin

Abstract: Who chooses suicide attacks? Though rebels typically target poor countries, suicide attacks are just as likely to target rich democracies. Though many groups have grievances, suicide attacks are favored by the radical religious. Though rebels often kill coreligionists, they seldom use suicide attacks to do so. We model the choice of tactics by rebels, bearing in mind that a successful suicide attack imposes the ultimate cost on the attacker and the organization. We first ask what a suicide attacker would have to believe to be deemed rational. We then embed the attacker and other operatives in a club good model which emphasizes the function of voluntary religious organizations as providers of benign local public goods. The sacrifices which these groups demand solve a free-rider problem in the cooperative production of public goods. These sacrifices make clubs well suited for organizing suicide attacks, a tactic in which defection by operatives (including the attacker) endangers the entire organization. The model also analyzes the choice of suicide attacks as a tactic, predicting that suicide will be used when targets are well protected and when damage is great. Those predictions are consistent with the patterns described above. The model has testable implications for tactic choice of terrorists and for damage achieved by different types of terrorists, which we find to be consistent with the data.

Keywords: suicide attacks; insurgency; radical religious organizations; club goods model

JEL Codes: H56; Z12; D71; D74; H40


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
well-protected targets (Y50)potential damage is significant (H84)
stronger states (F55)increased use of suicide attacks (H56)
hybrid organizations providing local public goods (H44)more effective at carrying out suicide attacks (H56)
conditions unfavorable for traditional insurgency tactics (F51)higher likelihood of suicide attacks (H56)
organizational structure (L22)likelihood of employing suicide tactics (H56)

Back to index