Eat or Be Eaten: A Theory of Mergers and Merger Waves

Working Paper: NBER ID: w11364

Authors: Gary Gorton; Matthias Kahl; Richard Rosen

Abstract: In this paper, we present a model of defensive mergers and merger waves. We argue that mergers and merger waves can occur when managers prefer that their firms remain independent rather than be acquired. We assume that managers can reduce their chance of being acquired by acquiring another firm and hence increasing the size of their own firm. We show that if managers value private benefits of control sufficiently, they may engage in unprofitable defensive acquisitions. A technological or regulatory change that makes acquisitions profitable in some future states of the world can induce a preemptive wave of unprofitable, defensive acquisitions. The timing of mergers, the identity of acquirers and targets, and the profitability of acquisitions depend on the size of the private benefits of control, managerial equity ownership, the likelihood of a regime shift that makes some mergers profitable, and the distribution of firm sizes within an industry.

Keywords: mergers; merger waves; defensive acquisitions; managerial incentives

JEL Codes: G3


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Managers' preferences for independence (M54)Defensive mergers (G34)
Managerial private benefits are sufficiently high (D22)Unprofitable defensive acquisitions (G34)
Unprofitable defensive acquisitions (G34)Preempting potentially profitable acquisitions (G34)
Size of private benefits and distribution of firm sizes (D39)Timing of mergers and identity of acquirers and targets (G34)
Defensive mergers (G34)Merger waves (G34)
One firm's defensive acquisition (G34)Others more vulnerable (I14)

Back to index