Structuring and Restructuring Sovereign Debt: The Role of Seniority

Working Paper: NBER ID: w11071

Authors: Patrick Bolton; Olivier Jeanne

Abstract: In an environment characterized by weak contractual enforcement, sovereign lenders can enhance the likelihood of repayment by making their claims more difficult to restructure. We show within a simple model how competition for repayment between lenders may result in sovereign debt that is excessively difficult to restructure in equilibrium. Alleviating this inefficiency requires a sovereign debt restructuring mechanism that fulfills some of the functions of corporate bankruptcy regimes, in particular the enforcement of seniority and subordination clauses in debt contracts.

Keywords: No keywords provided

JEL Codes: F3; G3


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Sovereigns design debt structures that are difficult to restructure (F34)Enhance likelihood of repayment (G51)
Difficult to restructure debt structures (G32)Mitigate sovereign's incentive to repudiate debts (H63)
Competition among lenders for repayment (G21)Excessively difficult to restructure sovereign debt (F34)
Absence of enforceable seniority (J58)Sovereigns tempted to issue new debt (H63)
Sovereigns tempted to issue new debt (H63)Dilute existing debt claims (G33)
Policy interventions enforcing priority covenants (F55)Improve ex ante and ex post efficiency in sovereign debt markets (H63)

Back to index