Institutions and Technological Innovation During Early Economic Growth: Evidence from the Great Inventors of the United States, 1790-1930

Working Paper: NBER ID: w10966

Authors: B. Zorina Khan; Kenneth L. Sokoloff

Abstract: Employing a sample of renowned U.S. inventors that combines biographical detail with information on the patents they received over their careers, we highlight the impact of early U.S. patent institutions in providing broad access to economic opportunity and in encouraging trade in new technological knowledge. Through setting low fees and establishing administrative procedures for application, the United States deliberately created a patent system that allowed a much wider range, in socioeconomic class terms, of technologically creative individuals to obtain property rights to their inventions than did European patent institutions. Moreover, by requiring that applications be examined for novelty by technical experts, and by enforcing patent rights strictly, the U.S. system reduced uncertainty about the validity of patent rights, and in that way lowered the cost of transacting in them. Creating secure assets in new technological knowledge and facilitating access to markets in technology in this way both stimulated specialization at invention and further enhanced the opportunities available to technologically creative individuals who would otherwise have lacked the capital to directly extract returns from their efforts. Indeed, we show that until the late 19th century, the 'great inventors' of the U.S. generally had backgrounds that permitted them only limited formal schooling, and made extensive use of their abilities under the patent system to extract returns from trading their patent rights. The usefulness of the 19th century U.S. patent system to inventors with humble origins may have implications for the design of intellectual property institutions in contemporary developing countries.

Keywords: No keywords provided

JEL Codes: N10; N71; O31; O34


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
US patent system design (O38)access to economic opportunities for inventors (O36)
low fees and administrative procedures (K29)reduced uncertainty surrounding patent rights (O34)
reduced uncertainty surrounding patent rights (O34)lower transaction costs (D23)
lower transaction costs (D23)facilitate trade in technological knowledge (O36)
examination of applications for novelty (O31)secure assets in new technological knowledge (O36)
strict enforcement of patent rights (P14)secure assets in new technological knowledge (O36)
US patent system design (O38)stimulate specialization in invention (O31)
broad access to property rights (P14)fostering innovation (O35)

Back to index