Working Paper: NBER ID: w10510
Authors: Jennifer Hunt
Abstract: I study data on bribes actually paid by individuals to public officials, viewing the results through a theoretical lens that considers the implications of trust networks. A bond of trust may permit an implicit quid pro quo to substitute for a bribe, which reduces corruption. Appropriate networks are more easily established in small towns, by long-term residents of areas with many other long-term residents, and by individuals in regions with many residents their own age. I confirm that the prevalence of bribery is lower under these circumstances, using the International Crime Victim Surveys. I also find that older people, who have had time to develop a network, bribe less. These results highlight the uphill nature of the battle against corruption faced by policy-makers in rapidly urbanizing countries with high fertility. I show that victims of (other) crimes bribe all types of public officials more than non-victims, and argue that both their victimization and bribery stem from a distrustful environment.
Keywords: Trust; Bribery; Corruption; Crime; Networks
JEL Codes: K4; O1; D6
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
Cause | Effect |
---|---|
trust networks (D85) | bribery (H57) |
implicit quid pro quos (D86) | bribery (H57) |
age (J14) | bribery (H57) |
long-term residency (R23) | bribery (H57) |
regional demographics (R23) | bribery (H57) |
city size (R12) | bribery (H57) |
income (E25) | bribery (H57) |
victimization status (H84) | bribery (H57) |
trust networks (D85) | crime (K42) |
low trust environments (Z13) | bribery (H57) |
low trust environments (Z13) | crime (K42) |
victims of crimes (K42) | bribery (H57) |