Trust and Bribery: The Role of the Quid Pro Quo and the Link with Crime

Working Paper: NBER ID: w10510

Authors: Jennifer Hunt

Abstract: I study data on bribes actually paid by individuals to public officials, viewing the results through a theoretical lens that considers the implications of trust networks. A bond of trust may permit an implicit quid pro quo to substitute for a bribe, which reduces corruption. Appropriate networks are more easily established in small towns, by long-term residents of areas with many other long-term residents, and by individuals in regions with many residents their own age. I confirm that the prevalence of bribery is lower under these circumstances, using the International Crime Victim Surveys. I also find that older people, who have had time to develop a network, bribe less. These results highlight the uphill nature of the battle against corruption faced by policy-makers in rapidly urbanizing countries with high fertility. I show that victims of (other) crimes bribe all types of public officials more than non-victims, and argue that both their victimization and bribery stem from a distrustful environment.

Keywords: Trust; Bribery; Corruption; Crime; Networks

JEL Codes: K4; O1; D6


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
trust networks (D85)bribery (H57)
implicit quid pro quos (D86)bribery (H57)
age (J14)bribery (H57)
long-term residency (R23)bribery (H57)
regional demographics (R23)bribery (H57)
city size (R12)bribery (H57)
income (E25)bribery (H57)
victimization status (H84)bribery (H57)
trust networks (D85)crime (K42)
low trust environments (Z13)bribery (H57)
low trust environments (Z13)crime (K42)
victims of crimes (K42)bribery (H57)

Back to index