Putting Computerized Instruction to the Test: A Randomized Evaluation of a Scientifically-Based Reading Program

Working Paper: NBER ID: w10315

Authors: Cecilia E. Rouse; Alan B. Krueger; Lisa Markman

Abstract: Although schools across the country are investing heavily in computers in the classroom, there is surprisingly little evidence that they actually improve student achievement. In this paper we present results from a randomized study of a well-defined use of computers in schools: a popular instructional computer program, known as Fast ForWord, which is designed to improve language and reading skills. We assess the impact of the program using four different measures of language and reading ability. Our estimates suggest that while use of the computer program may improve some aspects of students' language skills, it does not appear that these gains translate into a broader measure of language acquisition or into actual reading skills.

Keywords: computerized instruction; reading program; randomized evaluation; language skills; educational technology

JEL Codes: I20


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
improvement in students' language skills (I25)no significant gains in actual reading skills (A21)
Fast ForWord (FFW) program (C88)improvement in students' language skills (I25)
Fast ForWord (FFW) program (C88)no detectable effect on reading skills (Y50)
Fast ForWord (FFW) program (C88)minimal impact on reading skills (A21)

Back to index