The US Productivity Slowdown: A Case of Statistical Myopia

Working Paper: NBER ID: w1018

Authors: Michael R. Darby

Abstract: This paper identifies three major periods: 1900-1929, 1929-1965, and 1965-1978. In contrast to the middle period, the extreme periods are characterized by rapid growth in private employment and hours worked; because growth in private productivity increases by less, measured labor productivity growth falls compared to the middle period. However this fall reflects a substantial substitution of quantity for quality in labor force growth: after private employment and hours are adjusted for age, sex, immigration, and education, no difference is observed among the average quality-adjusted labor productivity growth rates. Substantial variation in these growth rates remains within the 1929-1965 and 1965-1978 periods. Slow quality-adjusted labor productivity growth during 1929-1948 is just offset by unusually rapid growth during 1948-1965; these variations are attributed to the near cessation of investment during the Depression and World War II and subsequent recovery of the capital-labor ratio. Thus no substantial variations in total factor productivity growth or technical progress is found. Variations inproductivity growth within 1965-1978 are explained by price-control induced biases in reported deflated output. Correction of these biases results inequal quality-adjusted labor productivity growth in 1965-1973 and 1973-1978.A substantial program of future research is proposed. A data appendix is included.

Keywords: No keywords provided

JEL Codes: No JEL codes provided


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
demographic adjustments (J11)productivity growth (O49)
statistical myopia (C46)observed decline in labor productivity growth (O49)
low capital-labor ratio (D24)decline in productivity growth during 1929-1948 (O49)
price controls (E64)productivity slowdown from 1973-1978 (O49)
demographic adjustments (J11)eliminate perceived decline in productivity growth (O49)
demographic factors (J11)productivity measurements (D20)

Back to index