Categorical Redistribution in Winner-Take-All Markets

Working Paper: NBER ID: w10104

Authors: Roland G. Fryer Jr.; Glenn C. Loury

Abstract: This paper constructs a simple model of pair-wise tournament competition to investigate categorical redistribution in winner-take-all markets. We consider two forms of redistribution: category-sighted, where employers are allowed to use categorical information in pursuit of their redistributive goals; and category-blind, where they are not. It is shown that the equilibrium category-sighted redistribution scheme involves a constant handicap given to agents in the disadvantaged category. Equilibrium category-blind redistribution creates a unique semi-separating equilibrium in which a large pool of contestants exerts zero effort, and this pool is increasing in the aggressiveness of the redistribution goal.

Keywords: Categorical Redistribution; Winner-Take-All Markets; Tournament Theory; Affirmative Action

JEL Codes: D3; D8; J4


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
category-sighted redistribution (D39)constant handicap for disadvantaged agents (J14)
category-sighted redistribution (D39)increased participation from disadvantaged groups (I24)
category-blind redistribution (D39)unique semi-separating equilibrium (C62)
category-blind redistribution (D39)significant pool of contestants exerts zero effort (D29)
aggressiveness of redistribution goal (P26)size of low-effort pool (C55)

Back to index